Roster limit changes not offered in latest filing on $2.8 billion NCAA lawsuit settlement
Attorneys involved in the $2.8 billion legal settlement aimed at transforming college sports have submitted a new brief that did not incorporate the proposed changes to team roster limits suggested by U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken. The attorneys argued that implementing such a significant change at this late stage would cause chaos within the college sports landscape.
The attorneys emphasized that the current plan represents a significant improvement over the existing system. They only recommended minor adjustments to the comprehensive deal announced last year, which will enable schools to share revenue with their athletes and provide compensation to former and current athletes who were previously restricted from earning money.
The response from the defendants, including the NCAA and the five largest conferences in the nation, highlighted the potential disruptions that would result from altering the roster limit rules. They explained that numerous roster decisions have already been made in anticipation of the settlement taking effect on July 1. Modifying the rules would not only affect the athletes set to lose their spots but also impact the decisions made by other student-athletes and member institutions.
Judge Wilken, who has granted preliminary approval of the settlement, had suggested adjustments to the roster limit rules in response to objections raised during the final hearing. The concerns primarily revolved around the potential loss of roster spots for athletes due to the new regulations.
The proposed changes include implementing roster limits and making all athletes eligible for scholarships, which could lead to an increase in financial aid available to athletes. However, it is expected to result in the reduction of roster spots across various sports programs as schools seek to manage the higher costs associated with the new rules.
The attorneys argued that delaying the implementation of the roster limits would be impractical and could lead to further complications. They emphasized the benefits that the settlement offers to athletes, including the opportunity to compete for scholarships and additional compensation that were previously unavailable.
In addition to addressing the roster limit concerns, the brief also sought to clarify other issues raised by the judge, such as ensuring future Division I athletes are covered under the settlement and proposing an extension for athletes to calculate damages claims.
Overall, the attorneys anticipate a final decision from Judge Wilken in the coming weeks, with the July 1 deadline looming. Despite the challenges and objections raised, the settlement represents a significant step towards reforming college sports and providing athletes with greater opportunities for compensation and benefits.
