Holocaust book, Maya Angelou’s autobiography among nearly 400 items pulled from Naval Academy library in DEI purge

The removal of nearly 400 books from the U.S. Naval Academy’s library has sparked controversy and raised questions about the Trump administration’s efforts to purge diversity, equity, and inclusion content from federal agencies. Among the books removed were important works on the Holocaust, feminism, civil rights, racism, and Maya Angelou’s autobiography, “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings.”

The list of removed books, which was provided by the Navy, includes titles like “Memorializing the Holocaust,” “Half American,” “A Respectable Woman,” and “Pursuing Trayvon Martin.” These books cover a range of topics related to diversity, gender identity, sexuality, transgender issues, race, and gender.

Officials at the Naval Academy explained that the removal of these books was in compliance with directives outlined in Executive Orders issued by the President. The decision to remove the books was made after a thorough review of the library catalog, which identified nearly 900 books for further scrutiny. Ultimately, about 400 books were deemed to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion and were removed from the library.

The Pentagon has emphasized its commitment to implementing President Trump’s Executive Orders, which include banning DEI instruction in federal-funded schools. The Naval Academy, along with the Air Force Academy and the U.S. Military Academy, had not been initially included in this ban, as they are colleges. However, the Naval Academy came under scrutiny after a media report highlighted the presence of DEI-promoting books in its library.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has been a driving force behind the removal of DEI content from federal agencies, including the military academies. While these efforts have faced backlash from lawmakers, local leaders, and citizens, the Pentagon has stood by its decision to remove such content.

The removal of books promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion raises concerns about censorship and the erasure of important historical and educational resources. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how the military academies will navigate the balance between compliance with executive orders and the preservation of diverse perspectives in education.