Minnesota DA’s woke two-tier justice prizes Tesla violence
In an unexpected turn of events in Minnesota, local media outlets are questioning the decision of left-wing county prosecutor Mary Moriarty for her controversial choice not to charge a six-time Tesla vandal for his politically motivated acts of violence. Inspired by The New York Post’s coverage of the story, reporters are digging deeper into Moriarty’s handling of the case.
The incident involved state government employee Dylan Adams, 33, who was caught on video vandalizing six Teslas in late March during a wave of hate-fueled attacks against Elon Musk’s company. The damages amounted to $21,000, with one car alone suffering over $10,000 in destruction. Despite the severity of the crimes, Moriarty opted to offer Adams “diversion” instead of pursuing criminal charges.
Moriarty defended her decision by claiming that diversion programs reduce recidivism and enhance public safety by allowing individuals to keep their jobs and pay restitution. However, her office’s diversion guidelines typically apply to property crimes below $5,000, raising questions about the appropriateness of her actions in this case.
The media scrutiny intensified when it was revealed that on the same day Adams received diversion, Moriarty charged a 19-year-old woman with no prior criminal record with a first-degree felony for keying a single car belonging to a co-worker, resulting in $7,000 in damages. This stark contrast in treatment highlighted the inconsistencies in Moriarty’s approach to prosecuting offenders.
The Minneapolis Star Tribune, a left-leaning publication, uncovered Moriarty’s track record of leniency towards criminals, prompting public outcry over her perceived lack of commitment to upholding the law. Despite her claims of making charging decisions without considering political consequences, Moriarty’s handling of the Adams case sent a clear message that certain individuals may be exempt from legal consequences based on their affiliations or motives.
As a member of Minnesota’s Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, Moriarty’s ties to progressive politicians like Rep. Ilhan Omar and Attorney General Keith Ellison have raised concerns about her impartiality in carrying out her duties as county prosecutor. With her re-election on the horizon in 2026, the controversy surrounding her decision not to prosecute Adams has stirred tensions within the local law enforcement community and among political figures in Minneapolis.
Ultimately, Moriarty’s actions have sparked a debate about accountability and justice in Hennepin County, with critics accusing her of prioritizing political considerations over the fair and equal application of the law. As the public grapples with the implications of her leniency towards a repeat offender, the fallout from this case serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and consistency in the criminal justice system.
